This is what Professor Adolfo Castilla (Professor of Applied Economics at the Universidad Antonio de Nebrija) calls “the five fingers of the economic death” by taking the English expression “The five fingers of death “used by American films of black cinema. Al “Slovenia effect” adds the continuous rise of interest rates, the decline of the United States, the tax burden to rise and continued appreciation of exchange rates. The danger is a possible revival of the crisis by incorrect action of the institutions governing the global economy. I should add that the political tensions change the framework in which business is done in the world. Emerging economies offer dangers of this type, the disparity in income. Already, in large part, success depends on the use of advanced technology or costs, but the political game, especially anti-American. Let’s add corruption and legal uncertainty.

In short, the recent crisis wounded as Marcelo Manucci (Doctor of Science in Communication-USAL “) draws so far,” forcibly idealized economic structure. ” Moreover, the crisis severely affected a model of reality. The birth of globalized world presents new challenges and new events. Now the change in global economic management and is consistent with this new reality or march towards another cycle of paradoxes. It is necessary to leave here too the old paradigms and interference in the new direction. We live in an environment moving circular.

“There is no beginning or end of the process,” said Jay W. Forrester, the father of “System Dynamics.” Stefano Zamagni (Department of Economics, University of Bologna and an expert on European economy of the Third Sector) rightly reminds us that economic theories are never neutral and that the current paradigm until now called “neoliberal” forget this truth. However, the crisis presented us with the memory of the meeting of Rambouie (1975), near Paris, in which the heads of the six most developed countries agreed to launch the privatization and liberalization. And that is precisely what has been dysfunctional and where you can to emphasize what I have called several times the predominance of economics over politics. And a figure that grafted Zamagni, that civil wars since the 70s have been largely by the increase inequality

(Kosovo, and hutos tutzis, Eritrea and Somalia, Chechnya, etc.).. And of course, the second emergence, the new forms of totalitarianism. Hence the neo-statist theory as practiced in Venezuela, that of a voracious eats it all, facing the collapse of the nation state beyond a single neoliberal maneuver, forgetting that that power is lost in the global altar leads not only to neo-mercantilism. Perhaps inspired by the spirit of today still many argue Rambouie “pass”, ignoring the human obligation of the economy. The new economic world has to be marked by a horizontal subsidiarity which implies recognition of a transnational civil society. That is, a good deal of international cooperation for development has to go to society and non-organized civil institutions failing nation-state. The concern for humanity leads to what has been my approach based on the theme of the policy should regain their primacy over the economy, the strategies should be addressed to meet the growing poverty and consequent migrations, plus the new big issues such as health The ecological health and energy, in an envelope of the human.