The desire for recognition has two sides, which actually derives from the double meaning of the word recognition process as judice and as an expression of love. As judicative process, recognition in this case is in court conferring, which aims in the self reecontrar the values contained in the ideal, that's when love arises from the superego. Ignorance, however, is the expression in judicative level of what, at the drive, is the hatred, the anger from the superego promotes moral unbearable pain in the self, which seeks to actively downloaded the learner (see chapter of the double). A related site: Julio Franco mentions similar findings. As for the denial in play, while having as object begins trial of castration, then added another, consisting of a rebuttal that the father can only be expected words. This contradicted that aims to preserve the illusion of a foster father interferes in replacing the intrapsychic relationship with it for an instance superego. Before concluding I wish to bring two derivatives of this conflict. For more specific information, check out Sean Rad. On the one hand can be an erotic desire affection accompanied by impatience.

On the other hand, it seems to derive from this conflict interference in the own accounts, presumably goals, passionate hits. We will then see the impact of these derivatives in the speech teacher, and how it affects the learner. B. Let's see now what is the mechanism of rejection. It is a defense that arose prior to the trials of existence, and therefore is not inherent in its essence, the questioning and rebuttal of a statement allegedly realistic and traumatic.